Last week, an image of Robert Pattinson’s (aka Bumblebum) unclothed vagina appeared on the web. Since then, the photos of the “Kiss Kiss” star have been floating around the internet like wildfire. Though the photos are seemingly real, many fans are very skeptical about whether or not the image is actually of the actress’ vagina. Here’s the truth: Is it real or was it photoshopped? We will reveal all.
The Truth About The Vagina Pictures.
Though the photos of Robert Pattinson’s crotch area appear to be real, they most likely weren’t taken in the actual moment. Since the photos were first posted, many fans have claimed that they’ve spotted the actor in paparazzi photos taken before the leak. This suggests that someone probably photoshopped the intimate images of Pattinson and then leaked them online for some unknown reason.
The reason why the photos are so shocking is that the actor’s vagina is completely exposed. Most genitals are not visible when the person is wearing clothes. However, in these photos, the public is given a rare opportunity to see Robert Pattinson’s pubic region up close and personal. The fact that his genitalia is completely exposed only adds to the intrigue.
Can You Tell If A Photo Is Fake Or Real?
Though many have been quick to point out that the leaked photos of Robert Pattinson are fake, the truth is it is almost impossible to determine whether or not a photo is real. Since the internet has made it possible to distribute photos instantly, there is no longer any method of verifying the authenticity of a photograph.
At this point, all that can be done is speculate about whether or not a photo is real. Some have speculated that the photos are likely fake, while others think that they might be actual. We will touch on all of this later in the article, but for now, let’s just examine the evidence.
Real Or Photoshopped? Two Things To Consider.
When examining any image, whether it’s art, film, or photography, there are two things to consider; the first being the physical evidence and the other being the artistic elements. In the case of the photos of Robert Pattinson, no physical evidence suggests that they were taken during any sort of intimate encounter. This is an important fact since it gives the lie to any claims of an inappropriate photo being circulated.
As for the artistic elements, there are a few things that give the photos that extra something special. First, the lighting in the room is excellent, which creates a sort of dream-like atmosphere. It really does appear as if Robert Pattinson were merely sleeping, which lends a certain dream-like quality to the images.
As already stated, the main thing that makes the photos of Robert Pattinson so intriguing is that his genitals are completely exposed. Though it might be easy to claim that these are some sort of deliberate attempt at obscenity, the truth is that his genitalia is always in the open, whenever he is seen in public. This completely contradicts any claims of indecency, or at least, presents a totally different picture.
To this point, we have examined the evidence that the photos of Robert Pattinson are fake. The evidence suggests that these photos were probably taken a long time ago, which is why there are no signs of sexual activity, or at least none that the general public has witnessed. This does not mean that someone did not have sex with the actor in the privacy of their own home, only that it has not been proven or suggested in a public setting. There is also no evidence that the photos were leaked online for the purpose of causing controversy or scandal. In fact, there is every indication that the opposite is true; the fact that these photos have caused such a sensation suggests that they were intended to be private and intimate in nature.
Real Or Photoshopped? Three More Things To Consider.
Besides the physical evidence and the artistic elements, there are three more things that make the photos of Robert Pattinson so intriguing. The first is the positioning of the genitalia in relation to the actor’s body. The second is the content of the photos and the third is the fact that there is no sexual act depicted in the images. We will discuss each of these points in turn.
As already stated, the photos of Robert Pattinson are somewhat unusual in the fact that his genitalia is completely exposed. This is not normal for a paparazzi shot, where the individual’s pubic region is usually covered by some sort of cloth. However, this is also not unusual for an artistic or conceptual photo shoot. This was clearly a conscious decision on the part of the photographer.
The positioning of the genitalia is another point that makes the photos of Robert Pattinson stand out. Usually, the pubic region of an individual is not prominently featured in any way, shape or form in a paparazzi shot. This is usually restricted to a shot from below, looking up, at the genitals from the side or from behind. In the photo of Robert Pattinson, not only is his pubic region prominently featured, but the positioning is also very distinctive. The camera is placed so that the actor is completely open and relaxed, with his legs slightly apart. This position allows the viewer to examine every square inch of the actor’s genitalia, which, as we previously stated, is usually restricted to a shot from below, looking up, at the genitals from the side or from behind.
The last point that makes the photos of Robert Pattinson so distinctive is the fact that there is no sexual act depicted in the images. This was already mentioned in the previous point, but it is worth repeating. Though it is highly improbable that a photographer would conspire to shoot an image without showing any sort of sexual activity, it is entirely possible that certain artistic or conceptual stipulations were placed on the shoot. For example, if the subject was topless or completely unclothed, it would not be uncommon for there to be no sexual activity depicted.
To this point, we have addressed the issue of whether or not the photos of Robert Pattinson are real. We have examined the evidence and three additional points that make the photos so unique and intriguing. It is clear that this was a private and intimate act that the actor has shared only with his closest friends. It also seems that the photos were intended to be private and to shed light on an aspect of the artist’s personal life that he has chosen to keep secret. Though this is a strange and perhaps scandalous situation, it is also an opportunity for those curious about the inner workings of the artist’s mind.