Robert Pattinson in Virgin Blue Magazine!
A Robsessed reader found that Robert Pattinson covered the Virgin Blue Magazine on her flight. He looks mighty fine!
Robert Pattinson ... Who?
Do you know Robert Pattinson?
30 Comments
Leave a comment
I’ve never seen him look more “vampirish.” So good looking!
This pic looks like the ”another man” magazine pics.
But im not complaining. He always looks great
*passes champagne glass at Robward and clinks our glasses*
*climbs on top of piano and serenades Rob as he plays*
So… you come here often?
*sigh* Soooo romanticccccc.
ps. *******THUDDDDDD*******
pss. FAIL to the graphic artist who crop his hair out.
Mmm mmm good
mmmmmmmmmm………..may have to book a flight! I could handle and hour or so alone with Rob! *Sigh*
He’s breathtaking…..and I am breathless!
The Robert I know and love………
Ha.. I think he looks stoned in this shot!..
His eyes look a little wierd to me again…..but his lips look very kissable.
Finally…someone has recognized that it is not only the daughters who find him beautiful!!!
As a matter of fact my daughter prefer Taylor and I prefer Robert.
holy. sweet. jesus.
i thought my obsession was starting to wane…but alas, i think rob has ruined me for any other men….
is there a support group for rob-aholics? i need to join one.
His eyes look so dopey lol. Maybe he was sleepy on this day.
I wish Rob had of been in the virgin book when I flew to Brisbane earlier this year… I was bored out of my brain and I only had Jennifer Aniston to read about. And if I hear “poor Jennifer Aniston can’t find a man” one more time I am gunna scream… If someone as smoking hot as her can’t get a man, what hope do the rest of us have? Lol. Rob would have been WAY better to look at.
his sleepy eyes look SEXY…….and Newrobfan……..my sentiments exactly….other men are so boring, lately compared to Rob……….i know that’s not healthy, but what’s a woman to do???!! LOL!!!
Just saw on CNN that Arnold Swartzenager (California governor) signed a NEW Law today to keep PAPS from taking pictures of any actors on there private times, also BLOGS can be fined up to 15,000 if they post them on a website, ck it out all, Only from California though, but hopefully ALL states follow, like NY, Even CANADA.
censorship
I think that’s a good idea. I would hate to be followed around, having photos taken of me eating dinner and stuff. We all get to work but then have free time, as should they.
Sorry but I disagree…….it is NOT censorship……what it was was an invasion of privacy!!!
Actors are public figures and we are entitled to their PUBLIC lives not their PRIVATE ones!!!!
I will SO miss seeing pics of ROB roaming around L.A. and wherever else he may hang out but I’m thankful he’ll got some respite from the madness!!!
A person can not expect to have any privacy when they are in a Public place no matter who they are….I like photography and I have the right to take YOUR picture without YOUR permission if you are in a public place with no expectation of privacy ie…the sidewalk. The government takes our pictures all of the time without asking. It’s on little cameras facing into the sidewalk, there are cameras taking pictures of us at stop lights.
I would think that some celebrities aren’t happy about this. They depend on the paps to take their pictures and keep them in the limelight and keep people talking about them. The paps do have of the publicists job by making sure that people are talking about their clients. In show business ANY news is still free publicity and in such a competitive arena…….they want it.
I thought the law was geared towards stars at home and on private property. Once someone steps out in a public domain, they can’t control that. Although, it would be interesting to see what happens to a stars career, if pictures of them out and about are not displayed in magazines. I think reality stars would probably be the only ones that suffer.
right with you on all of the above @rae…
But the paps don’t just take pics of the celebs on the street that climb trees and take pics of them in their backyards… They get helicopters and take pics from the sky. That’s where it gets really rediculous and that’s what I think NEEDS to stop. If you can’t be left alone in your own home, there is something wrong.
That should say “they” not that lol.
Absolutely Stacey and it’s my understanding that it’s already illegal to shoot into someone’s windows or onto their private property. So certainly when that is done, those paps should be punished. However, if celebs or anyone is walking to and fro their hair appointment or whatever then they are in public and anyone can take their picture.
There would have to be something they could do about the paparrazi though, because walking out of restaurant and having 40 people standing there with cameras is rediculous. It’s definately different to having your photo taken by a camera on a traffic light lol. The paps just piss me off, I think. They are leeches and it is a scummy way to make a living.
It’s a partnership. At least the paps ARE doing something to earn their money. At least they aren’t in the welfare line with their hands out not even trying to earn a living. Or, even worse, asking “are you sure that my kid doesn’t have a disability because then I could get me some SSI”. Yes, I think WANTING something to be wrong with your child so that you can receive government funding is much more despicable then taking pictures of some people who signed onto the fame game.
There are other ways to make a living that don’t involve harrassing and exploiting people. Regardless of what career they chose they still deserve some level of privacy and freedom.
No what would be the fun in that??????
I’m sure they’d enjoy it lol.